← Back to blog

Published on February 14, 2026 by Electric Le Mans Initiative

Battery + Charging: The 45-Minute Stint and the 2 MW Pit Stop

One-sentence promise: Our concept depends on two linked targets: a ~45-minute stint and charging fast enough to keep total race math competitive.

Concept-Stage Targets

Current working targets:

  • stint length: about 45 minutes
  • stint distance: about 13 to 14 laps
  • pack size: about 150 to 200 kWh
  • SOC window: about 10% to 80%
  • charging target: about 2 MW
  • stop target: 2 to 3 minutes

These are hypotheses, not validated data.

Part 1: Energy Per Lap and Pack Sizing

A rough anchor can be formed from published high-performance EV references, but direct transfer to Le Mans is risky. Le Mans has long high-speed sections where drag dominates and regen opportunities differ from tighter circuits.

If stint energy demand exceeds expected usable window, only a few levers exist:

  • improve energy efficiency at target pace
  • shorten full-pace stint length
  • change SOC operating window
  • increase pack size
  • leverage neutralization windows strategically

The immediate requirement is a physics-based internal energy model, not optimism.

Part 2: Charging Time Math

Use:

E_add = P * t

For a 200 kWh pack charging 10% -> 80%:

  • E_add = 0.70 * 200 = 140 kWh
  • At P = 2000 kW, ideal t = 140 / 2000 h = 0.07 h = 4.2 min

That is ideal only. Real pit execution also includes:

  • plug/unplug operations
  • safety checks and interlocks
  • ramp-up/ramp-down behavior
  • thermal limitations of pack, cable, and connector

So a consistent 2 to 3 minute stop is aggressive unless one of these becomes true:

  1. Effective charging power is materially above 2 MW
  2. Energy per stop is reduced (smaller SOC swing)
  3. Neutralization timing absorbs part of charging penalty

Part 3: The Real Engineering Problem

Peak power on a spec sheet is not enough. Endurance viability depends on repeatable execution when hardware is hot and timing pressure is high.

Critical constraints include:

  • connector and cable handling
  • connector/cable cooling
  • HV safety interlocks and isolation checks
  • pack thermal condition at arrival
  • repeatability over many stops

Open Questions (TBD)

  • What is our modeled kWh/lap at target pace with aero and mass assumptions?
  • What charging curve should we assume across SOC and temperature?
  • For a 2 to 3 minute stop target, what must change first: SOC delta, pack size, or charging power?

Written by Electric Le Mans Initiative

← Back to blog

Recent Techposts

  • Make the First Move: Bringing a Pure EV to Le Mans (Garage 56, 2030)

    Concept-stage plan for a pure EV Garage 56 entry at Le Mans in 2030, with clear success criteria and open technical questions.

  • Garage 56 Explained: The Most Realistic Door for a Pure EV (Now)

    Why Garage 56 is currently the most realistic path to field a pure EV at Le Mans before a dedicated EV class exists.

  • Our Benchmark: "Beat LMGT3 on Total Time" - What It Really Means

    We are not entering LMGT3; we are using LMGT3 total race outcome as a benchmark for credible EV endurance competitiveness.

  • Le Mans Is a Math Problem: Lap Time vs Pit Time vs Neutralizations

    A first-order 24-hour race model showing how lap pace, pit losses, and neutralization timing control total distance.

  • Battery + Charging: The 45-Minute Stint and the 2 MW Pit Stop

    Concept-stage sizing for a 45-minute EV stint at Le Mans and the pit-time implications of 2 MW-class charging.

  • Can an Electric Car Win GT3 at Le Mans with LMH Lap Times?

    We asked a different question: Even with charging, can an electric car win the GT3 class? Under very specific conditions, the answer is yes.